On Sept. 19, YouTube done an central proclamation that they were formulation to mislay corroboration badges from a vast tie of users in an bid to change a approach being accurate works. This change would also concede a height to change a checkmark and a approach people demeanour during it. However, a problem is that many of a eccentric creators on YouTube would humour from losing their corroboration badges.

Almost immediately, many YouTube users voiced their dissapoint over this decision, with a recoil reaching a heat representation within 24 hours of a proclamation being made. According to CNN, a recoil reached such considerable levels that a association has once again altered their position on a corroboration badges.

It seems that YouTube satisfied that they were “missing a mark” by holding divided a accurate check symbol that so many calm creators use to move in viewers. In a new blog post from a association on Sept. 20, they done it transparent that they have altered their minds about holding divided now accurate users badges. This means that no appeals will need to be filed, and anyone who is now accurate will sojourn verified.

However, while YouTube competence have altered their preference about a corroboration check marks, they are still looking into ways to improved concede people to get a accurate badge. For now, any channel with some-more than 100,000 subscribers is authorised to be verified, nonetheless a association is formulation to do a improved examination routine relocating forward. Ultimately, a association is looking to be some-more perceptive when it comes to channels being verified, though if calm creators already have a corroboration badge, they will get to keep it (at slightest for now).

Written by Kimberley Spinney

Sources:

CNN – YouTube won’t take accurate badges divided from creators after backlash

Image Credit – Travis Wise’s Flickr Page – Creative Commons License

YouTube Has Changed Their Stance on Verified Badges, Again combined by Kimberley Spinney on Sep 21, 2019
View all posts by Kimberley Spinney →